MacKinnon Mechanisms: ei bs (plus ee bs); synchrotron; IC - discussion of Korchak (1967) figure comparing spectra McClements-Brown (1986) and Kaufmann (1986) Conclusion: BS dominates except in possible special cases Evidence for relativistic electrons: > 1 MeV - Microwave - > 10 MeV X-rays - Pi-zero flattening - SEP relativistic electrsons (Posner-Droge recent work?) Grant May 24, 1990 spectra Vlahos: Do flares make MeV electrons? - yes, both early and late Pion gamma-ray overview Synchrotron overview - Silva-Share work on THz in preprint form IC overview - plot showing basic spectrum (mention of Riemann zeta function) - a wonderful formula for I_ic/I_bs - in principle one might upscatter optical photons: bright patches of coronal X-ray emission? So: no synchrotron contributions, but a possible window of opportunity for inverse Compton for a hard electron distribution, with directivity Discussion of applications... Battaglia Wheatland-Melrose 95: Simple model calculations showing relationship of thick and thin with index change of 2 (steady state, no PA distribution, etc., etc.) RHESSI observations with "Case A" and "Case B" depending on FP/LT spectral difference MacKinnon: diffusion effects important below 10*kT (Emslie paper was not correct) Competition in Case A with thermal emission Poor agreement with model suggests modifications 1) electron beam modified non-collisionally? e.g., return-current field? 2) misunderstanding of density/critical energy? Vlahos: there are other possibilities already in the literature Fletcher: What about Valentina's work? - Observationally inconsistent Hudson: SHS in both high and low-energy ranges? Fletcher: perhaps we can conclude that the coronal sources really do differ from the impulsive-phase sources Krucker: but be careful about systematic errors in the fitting Improvements in W-M type of model can produce a better reconciliation with data (just add an E-field) in a steady-state model Masuda Survey for coronal HXR sources from Yohkoh/HXT April 5 2001 Nitta event, nice composite movie General discussion, how to relate this to RHESSI framework, 13 degrees Superhot thermal: 30-50 MK, Kosugi et al. 1994 6-Feb-92 Not occulted (Tomczak). Suggest the two peaks come from different locations (White) or from Veronig-Brown dense corona (Hudson)? Nitta et al. 2001 analysis of motions Tsuneta analysis of Masuda flare Tsuneta analysis of 21-Feb flare Tomczak - caveats Development of Yohkoh HXT flare catalog (dx.doi.org/10.1007/s112-7-006-1831-5 1 GB) Examination of catalog for occulted events: 98, or 7.6% of catalog - centroids above limb - limb appears to cut SXR (bias against impulsive SXR brightenings) - longitude > 90 degrees Longitudes by two methods: extrapolation of H-alpha locations, spot records via 13.45 - 3*sin^2 Example of 8-May-98 event and region Plot of gamma from M1/L ratio vs apparent longitude for 94 events - extreme case, both hardness and longitude, 18-apr-01! Remove exceptions (no maximum or ambiguous) => 52 events - only 3 events for which HH/M2 ratio available Gamma distribution strongly shows soft coronal sources (6.7+-1.4 vs 4.0+-1.1) in M2/M1 Gamma distribution for HH/M2 much more comparable, but only 3 occulted events Gamma vs M1 counts scattergram, showing occulted and non-occulted events M2/M1 vs M1/LO color-color Summary statistics suggest inverse Compton!? Centroid shifts vs height, also SXT vs HXT/LO Closer looks at 3 H-channel events: - 18-apr-01 - 23-apr-98 (Tomczak 03, 04, 05; Sato 01). Type C? - 9-may-98 nice SHS+SHH development at high energies, but not lower. Thermal interpretation of HXT at lower energies is difficult More on 9 May Nice hard X-ray ejection seen in movies, but < 100 km/s Nice graphic of SXT ejecta, starting earlier than HZXR Another possibility: 27-feb-94 Another possibility: 1-apr-01 Conclude that HXT also could see SHH category ("type C") - often masked by other emissions - close connection with ejections and SEPs White: so we're happy with thin target in the corona Krucker: consistent with RHESSI data, note energy correlation Hudson: trapping time scale determines limit Vlahos discussion on theory Defining the problem: - location within the loop or above it? - motion (only ever up?) - energetics, thin & thick target - sizes - number of particles - phase of flare - correlations with CME, microaves... - height - spectra - SHS in corona and in footpoints - time profiles - co-spatiality of source and accelerator? Theory summary - Fletcher-Martens paper - high density (10^10) - energetics - need 10^28 ergs/s > 25 keV - current-sheet properties - evacuation of corona via collapsing trap? - populations of electrons the same? - transport of particles not a negligible problem - distribution function and its evolution ditto Theory of loop-top coronal sources - collapsing traps - injection of particles needed - combination of collapsing trap and turbulent current sheet? - Petrosian-Donaghy model puts the accelerator at the loop top (Discussion of Veronig-Brown event) (more " ") A better idea - "whistler turbulence" - stochastic E-fields, rather than super dense - self-sustain acceleration and trapping from "statistically interesting stressed fields" (Rim Turkmani) (much discussion) (discussion of stochastic trapping vs turbulent trapping) (Fletcher: preflare mass from filament? Much discussion) Above-the-loop-top sources Masuda source being different... Drake et al. or Onofri et al.: behind the CME, large current sheet collapsing to small-scale ones => Masuda source? Opinions AR has multiple loops preflare stressing can accelerate particles Masuda source from local trapping Late phase maybe distinct from CS(s)? rareness of these sources may be due to faintness