ISSI International Team

Filamentary Structure and Dynamics of
Solar Magnetic Fields
Scientific rationale and goals
main page

Current status, unsolved problems and primary focus

The problem of the filamentary structure of solar magnetic fields has a long history of investigation. Importance of studying the filamentary structure for understanding the nature of solar magnetism was pointed out from theoretical arguments and observational data long time ago by Alfven (1963) and Severny (1965). They suggested that the magnetic field in sunspots, quiet Sun regions and corona consists of bundles of magnetic field lines. However, the resolution of the magnetographic observations was only 2-4 arcsec (1500-3000 km). Stenflo (1973) developed a spectroscopic line ratio method, which showed that the photospheric network consists of spatially unresolved magnetic structures of the characteristic size of 100-300 km and field strength of about 2 kG.

The existence of such filamentary structures in the quiet Sun regions has been a subject of debate for many years, but eventually was confirmed by high-resolution observations (e.g. Keller et al. 1990) and numerical simulations (Nordlund 1983). Recent observational data from the Hinode space mission revealed formation of magnetic flux tubes of kilogauss field strength by convective collapse (Nagata et al. 2008). The observed events are consistent with the process of field intensification by flux advection, radiative cooling, and strong downflow found in MHD simulations. Hinode observations also indicated that the unresolved structures of horizontal magnetic field can be as small as 50 km (Ishikawa et al. 2008). Numerical simulations also showed that the ubiquitous horizontal field may be a manifestation of magnetic field generation by local dynamo (Danilovic et al. 2010). However, the simulations of Steiner et al. (2008) suggest that the horizontal internetwork fields are a natural consequence of flux expulsion in the vertical direction, without any need to invoke surface dynamo action. Thus, the role of local dynamo is a subject of debate.

An interesting question is if such filamentary flux tubes represent ultimate building blocks of the solar magnetism or there are much smaller "hidden magnetism" structuring (de Wijn et al. 2009). The magnetic Reynolds number of the solar plasma is very high, making possible the existence of magnetic structures on the scale of only few meters (Sanchez Almeida 1998). How this "sub-grid scale" structuring may affect the observational results and numerical simulations is uncertain. It has been suggested that the traditional two-component "standard model", in which isolated magnetic flux tubes are embedded into non-magnetic plasma, is too simplistic (Stenflo 2009), although there is no general consensus as to whether or not this is the case. The analysis of asymmetries of observed line polarization profiles provides an important diagnostic tool to infer the properties of unresolved magnetic structures, and has predicted their richness (Sanchez Almeida et al. 1996; Sanchez Almeida and Lites 2000). This is one of the venues we will explore to constrain properties of the filamentary structure at the smallest scales. Certainly, the formation and dynamics of the filamentary magnetic structures in quiet Sun regions is one of the central problems of solar magnetism. Comparing high-resolution and spectro-polarimetric observations with realistic MHD simulations is a promising approach to solving this problem. This includes analysis of synthetic Stokes calculated for the MHD simulations (Khomenko et al. 2005), high-resolution imaging spectroscopy and spectropolarimetric (Hanle and Zeeman) observations.

In sunspots the filamentary structure of magnetic field is apparent. Recent numerical simulations showed that the filamentary magnetic structure and dynamics of the sunspot umbra and penumbra may be a natural consequence of magneto-convection in strong field regions (Heinemann et al. 2007; Scharmer et al. 2008; Kitiashvili et al. 2009a; Rempel et al. 2009b). The numerical simulations reproduce the basic dynamics of the sunspot umbra and the penumbra and have revealed the nature of umbral dots and the Evershed outflow (Schuessler and Voegler 2006; Kitiashvili et al. 2009b; Nordlund and Scharmer 2009; Rempel et al. 2009a). The simulation describe details of the filamentary magnetic structures and their dynamics, such as the appearance of high-speed "Evershed cloud" and moving "sea-serpent" field lines (Sainz Dalda and Bellot Rubio 2008; Kitiashvili et al. 2010).

The recent results demonstrate the power of the realistic radiative MHD simulations of the complicated turbulent processes in the upper convective layer and photosphere. They not only explain the observed phenomena, but also make interesting predictions. For instance, the simulation of the turbulent magneto-convection in strong inclined magnetic fields, modeling the Evershed effect, indicated that the high-speed flows along the magnetic filaments may have a coherent organization, which appears quasi-periodically on a large scale, and that this organization becomes more prominent when the mean magnetic field in penumbra is stronger (Kitiashvili et al. 2009b). Observations have provided hints of such large-scale organization of the Evershed flows (Rimmele and Marino 2006), but this effect has not been investigated, and its implications for the sunspot structure and dynamics are unclear.

Perhaps, one of the most important problems of the solar magnetism is the understanding of the mechanism of formation of sunspots and active regions. Helioseismology results from MDI and Hinode (Kosovichev et al. 2000; Zhao et al. 2001; Zhao et al. 2010) seem to confirm Parker's idea that sunspots represent bundles of filamentary magnetic structures held together by converging downdrafts (Parker 1979). Such downdrafts have been observed around small-scale elements on the Sun and reproduced in the simulations. But, in sunspots they may be hidden from direct observations by the Evershed flows in the penumbra. The initial attempts to simulate the whole sunspot structure in realistic turbulent conditions show that such structure is quickly destroyed by convection unless it is held by the boundary condition that fixes the magnetic flux concentrated in a small area at the bottom (Rempel et al. 2009b). The simulations of emerging magnetic flux in the turbulent convective environment also have not been able to reproduce the formation of sunspot-like structures; however, they appear to explain quite well the formation of small-scale filamentary flux tubes and transient kG horizontal field (Cheung et al. 2008; Stein et al. 2010). These simulations made a prediction of formation of a horizontal magnetic flux sheet just below the visible photospheric layer, which can be tested by local helioseismology.

Thus, the recent results of high-resolution observations and numerical simulations have provided a significant new insight into the physics of the filamentary magnetic structures on the Sun. The understanding of the small-scales will then be the key to understand the global structure and stability of sunspots and large-scale magnetic structures (Schlichenmaier 2009), and also coupling to the chromosphere and corona (Wedemeyer-Bohm et al. 2009). It is remarkable that this progress is achieved by a synergy of observations and modeling, and we expect that this synergy will stimulate further progress in the field.

The proposed investigation will focus on the origin and physical properties of filamentary magnetic structures and their role in large-scale magnetic phenomena and dynamics on the Sun. This investigation is particularly important and timely because of the simultaneously operating space missions Hinode and SDO, and large solar telescopes, which provide unprecedented coverage of the solar magnetism from smallest scales to the global-Sun scale.

References

1. Alfven, H. (1963). "On the Filamentary Structure of the Solar Corona". IAU Symp. 16, The Solar Corona, 35.
2. Cheung, M. C. M., M. Schuessler, T. D. Tarbell and A. M. Title (2008). "Solar Surface Emerging Flux Regions: A Comparative Study of Radiative MHD Modeling and Hinode SOT Observations." The Astrophysical Journal 687: 1373-1387.
3. Danilovic, S., M. Schuessler and S. K. Solanki (2010) "Probing quiet Sun magnetism using MURaM simulations and Hinode/SP results: support for a local dynamo." ArXiv e-prints 1001, 2183.
4. de Wijn, A. G., J. O. Stenflo, S. K. Solanki and S. Tsuneta (2009). "Small-Scale Solar Magnetic Fields." Space Science Reviews 144: 275-315.
5. Heinemann, T., A. Nordlund, G. B. Scharmer and H. C. Spruit (2007). "MHD Simulations of Penumbra Fine Structure." The Astrophysical Journal 669: 1390-1394.
6. Ishikawa, R., S. Tsuneta, K. Ichimoto, H. Isobe, Y. Katsukawa, B. W. Lites, S. Nagata, T. Shimizu, R. A. Shine, Y. Suematsu, T. D. Tarbell and A. M. Title (2008).
"Transient horizontal magnetic fields in solar plage regions." Astronomy and Astrophysics 481: L25-L28.
7. Keller, C. U., J. O. Stenflo, S. K. Solanki, T. D. Tarbell and A. M. Title (1990). "Solar magnetic field strength determinations from high spatial resolution filtergrams." Astronomy and Astrophysics 236: 250-255.
8. Khomenko, E. V., S. Shelyag, S. K. Solanki and A. Voegler (2005). "Stokes diagnostics of simulations of magnetoconvection of mixed-polarity quiet-Sun regions." Astronomy and Astrophysics 442: 1059-1078.
9. Kitiashvili, I. N., L. R. Bellot Rubio, A. G. Kosovichev, N. N. Mansour, A. Sainz Dalda and A. A. Wray (2010) "Explanation of the sea-serpent magnetic structure of sunspot penumbrae." ArXiv e-prints 1003, 49.
10. Kitiashvili, I. N., L. Jacoutot, A. G. Kosovichev, A. A. Wray and N. N. Mansour (2009a). "Numerical Modeling of Solar Convection and Oscillations in Magnetic Regions". American Institute of Physics Conference Series, 1170, 569-573.
11. Kitiashvili, I. N., A. G. Kosovichev, A. A. Wray and N. N. Mansour (2009b). "Traveling Waves of Magnetoconvection and the Origin of the Evershed Effect in Sunspots." The Astrophysical Journal 700: L178-L181.
12. Kosovichev, A. G., T. L. J. Duvall, Jr. and P. H. Scherrer (2000). "Time-Distance Inversion Methods and Results - (Invited Review)." Solar Physics 192: 159-176.
13. Nagata, S., S. Tsuneta, Y. Suematsu, K. Ichimoto, Y. Katsukawa, T. Shimizu, T. Yokoyama, T. D. Tarbell, B. W. Lites, R. A. Shine, T. E. Berger, A. M. Title, L. R. Bellot Rubio and D. Orozco Suarez (2008). "Formation of Solar Magnetic Flux Tubes with Kilogauss Field Strength Induced by Convective Instability." The Astrophysical Journal 677: L145-L147.
14. Nordlund, A. (1983). "Numerical 3-D simulations of the collapse of photospheric flux tubes". Solar and Stellar Magnetic Fields: Origins and Coronal Effects, 102, 79-83.
15. Nordlund, A. and G. B. Scharmer (2009) "Convection and the Origin of Evershed Flows." ArXiv e-prints 0905, 918.
16. Parker, E. N. (1979). "Sunspots and the physics of magnetic flux tubes. I - The general nature of the sunspot. II - Aerodynamic drag." The Astrophysical Journal 230: 905-923.
17. Rempel, M., M. Schuessler, R. H. Cameron and M. Knoelker (2009a). "Penumbral Structure and Outflows in Simulated Sunspots." Science 325: 171.
18. Rempel, M., M. Schuessler and M. Knoelker (2009b). "Radiative Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of Sunspot Structure." The Astrophysical Journal 691: 640-649.
19. Rimmele, T. and J. Marino (2006). "The Evershed Flow: Flow Geometry and Its Temporal Evolution." The Astrophysical Journal 646: 593-604.
20. Sainz Dalda, A. and L. R. Bellot Rubio (2008). "Detection of sea-serpent field lines in sunspot penumbrae." Astronomy and Astrophysics 481: L21-L24.
21. Sanchez Almeida, J. (1998). "The Unresolved Structure of Photospheric Magnetic Fields: Truths, Troubles and Tricks (Invited review)". Three-Dimensional Structure of Solar Active Regions, ASP Conf., 155, 54.
22. Sanchez Almeida, J., E. Landi Degl'Innocenti, V. Martinez Pillet and B. W. Lites (1996). "Line Asymmetries and the Microstructure of Photospheric Magnetic Fields." The Astrophysical Journal 466: 537.
23. Sanchez Almeida, J. and B. W. Lites (2000). "Physical Properties of the Solar Magnetic Photosphere under the MISMA Hypothesis. II. Network and Internetwork Fields at the Disk Center." The Astrophysical Journal 532: 1215-1229.
24. Scharmer, G. B., A. Nordlund and T. Heinemann (2008). "Convection and the Origin of Evershed Flows in Sunspot Penumbrae." The Astrophysical Journal 677: L149-L152.
25. Schlichenmaier, R. (2009). "Sunspots: From Small-Scale Inhomogeneities Towards a Global Theory." Space Science Reviews 144: 213-228.
26. Schuessler, M. and A. Voegler (2006). "Magnetoconvection in a Sunspot Umbra." The Astrophysical Journal 641: L73-L76.
27. Severny, A. B. (1965). "The Nature of Solar Magnetic Fields (The Fine Structure of the Field)." Soviet Astronomy 9: 171.
28. Stein, R. F., A. Lagerfjard, A. Nordlund and D. Georgobiani (2010). "Solar Flux Emergence Simulations." Solar Physics: 34.
29. Steiner, O., R. Rezaei, W. Schaffenberger and S. Wedemeyer-Bohm (2008). "The Horizontal Internetwork Magnetic Field: Numerical Simulations in Comparison to Observations with Hinode." The Astrophysical Journal 680: L85-L88.
30. Stenflo, J. O. (1973). "Magnetic-Field Structure of the Photospheric Network." Solar Physics 32: 41-63.
31. Stenflo, J. O. (2009) "Measuring the Hidden Aspects of Solar Magnetism." ArXiv e-prints 0903, 4935.
32. Wedemeyer-Bohm, S., A. Lagg and A. Nordlund (2009). "Coupling from the Photosphere to the Chromosphere and the Corona." Space Science Reviews 144: 317-350.
33. Zhao, J., A. G. Kosovichev and T. L. Duvall, Jr. (2001). "Investigation of Mass Flows beneath a Sunspot by Time-Distance Helioseismology." The Astrophysical Journal 557: 384-388.
34. Zhao, J., A. G. Kosovichev and T. Sekii (2010). "High-Resolution Helioseismic Imaging of Subsurface Structures and Flows of a Solar Active Region Observed by Hinode." Astrophysical J. 708: 304-313.



Site hosted by ISSI