964 international scientists participated in ISSI’s scientific activities in person in 2025, 595 of them from ESA Member States and ESA. 479 (49%) visited ISSI for the first time. ISSI hosted in total 69 scientific activities and sponsors scientific interactions and collaborative research through a range of projects directed at both groups of researchers and individual scientists:
Workshops consist of up to 45 invited scientists exchanging their views on a scientific theme, typically over one week.
Breakthrough Workshops are designed to address key questions in science, by gathering the main experts on the topic, invite them to spend a week in a neutral and welcoming environment, discuss, and produce one high visibility, high impact, open access peer-reviewed paper.
International Teams consist of about 15 external scientists, addressing a specific scientific topic in a self-organised fashion.
Fora are informal and free-ranging debates among some 15 to 20 participants, to discuss future directions, innovations and challenges. These can be of a scientific nature or to do with science policy matters.
Working Groups have a smaller number of members and meet as often as necessary to achieve the assigned objective.
The Johannes Geiss Fellowship (JGF) is established to attract to ISSI – for limited duration visits – international scientists of stature, who can make demonstrable contributions to the ISSI mission.
Visiting Scientists spend between one week and two months at ISSI to work on a research project of their own, or to collaborate with ISSI’s staff and/or with research institutes in Switzerland.
Additionally, ISSI has dedicated funding to support the involvement of Early-Career Researchers in all its activities. 97 ECR have participated in 2025. This enables Early-Career Researchers to build international collaborative networks and contribute to multidisciplinary research.
Nearly forty experts met with the objective of reaching a community consensus view on the state-of-the-art knowledge of the local distance ladder using the broadest possible variety of methods available today. The goal was to obtain the most robust determination of the local value of the Hubble Constant to date, and to strengthen the collective understanding of the “Hubble Tension”. The Conveners of this workshop were Stefano Casertano (STScI), Richard Anderson (EPFL), Eleonora Di Valentino (Sheffield), Adam Riess (STScI/JHU), Licia Verde (Univ. Barcelona), and Antonella Nota (ISSI).
The Hubble Tension is the apparent conflict between the value of the Hubble constant measured locally and the value inferred from the favored cosmological model of the Universe, ΛCDM. The ΛCDM has provided for decades a successful explanation of the observed properties of galaxies and the structure of the Universe itself. With the extremely detailed measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background now available, coupled with the physics of the early Universe, this model predicts with great precision the value of the Hubble constant, the rate of expansion of the Universe at the present time. But the Hubble constant can also be measured directly in the local Universe, from distance estimates to individual objects and their measured redshift. Distance estimates are often based on a series of steps involving multiple distance indicators, forming the so-called “distance ladder”, which ultimately measure the distance of supernovae or other far-reaching distance indicators in the expansion flow. We know that the measured value of the Hubble constant, using multiple versions of the distance ladder, does not agree with the value predicted by the ΛCDM model, with the discrepancy estimated to be at least 5-6σ. Resolution of the Hubble tension promises to either identify significant, undiscovered anomalies in a large amount of collected data, or uncover new physics affecting the expansion and evolution of the Universe. Despite several years and dozens of attempts, no conclusive explanation or convincing interpretation has emerged for this discrepancy.
The ability to constrain the local distance ladder has evolved significantly over the last several years. Different distance indicators have been studied in greater detail, and now provide partially independent, comparable paths to distance estimates of the same objects; these include, for example, the period-luminosity relation for Cepheids; the luminosity of the tip of the red giant branch; the luminosity of the J-region of the asymptotic giant branch; the luminosity of oxygen-rich Mira variables; the angular size of Type II supernovae; and the amplitude of surface brightness fluctuations in galaxies. Multiple classes of distance indicators reach into the Hubble flow and provide independent ways to sample the expansion of the Universe; these include, for example, the standardised luminosity of Type Ia supernovae; the fundamental plane of elliptical galaxies; and megamasers. Together, these indicators have led to the development of a complex “distance network”, in which separate or partially overlapping paths can be followed to arrive at an estimate of the Hubble constant. However, in many cases different indicators share common elements, such as anchors, distance calibrations, or other types of common uncertainties, and thus cannot simply be averaged together. The only way to properly combine all these measurements into a coherent, single estimate of the local value of the Hubble constant is to fully understand the extent to which they share uncertainties and, conversely, the extent to which they provide independent constraints for the same quantity.
All independent groups working on this topic were invited to join. Through detailed discussions and a thorough analysis, supported by expert knowledge and deep understanding of the details of each approach, the participants were able to quantify the interrelations among all methods and build a full statistical model of the diverse constraints on the local distance scale. Such a comparison has never been carried out with full information and rigor; having the world’s experts together in the same room, in a neutral and welcoming environment, working to confirm each other’s methodology, has provided the answer to the question: “What is the best local value of the Hubble constant based on all evidence available today?”
As a result, this analysis yielded the most precise direct measurement to date of the current expansion rate of the Universe. In a paper published in March 2026 in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics, the H0 Distance Network (H0DN) Collaboration reports a value of the Hubble constant of H₀ = 73.50 ± 0.81 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹, corresponding to a precision of just over 1%.
Beyond delivering the most precise direct measurement of the Hubble constant to date, the Local Distance Network establishes a flexible and extensible framework for the future. With a flood of new observatories, improved calibrations, and additional geometric distance anchors becoming available, they can be integrated into the network to further refine our understanding of cosmic expansion and provide definitive clues about the resolution of the Hubble tension.
Antonella Nota
Stellar magnetism influences the radiative, particulate, and magnetic output of stars across a vast diversity of timescales, ranging from seconds, decades, to millennia and indeed stellar and planetary evolutionary timescales. This magnetically mediated activity has a profound influence on stellar astrospheres and the (exo)planets within them. In recent times, space-based observations from our own solar system, other exoplanetary systems and novel computational modelling approaches have revealed the varied and rich new physics at play that bridges stellar magnetism to planetary impacts. In this Workshop, our objective was to take stock of the status of the field, discuss outstanding challenges, envision potential future research directions, and brainstorm necessary space missions and observations that can spur the development of this emerging area of research with footprints across solar and stellar physics, heliospheric physics, and (exo)planetary sciences.
The Workshop gathered about 40 scientists from around the world to discuss the consequences of stellar magnetic variability on (exo)planetary space environments and atmospheric evolution which influence planetary habitability. A session was dedicated to future instrumentation initiatives that can provide important observational constraints and new discoveries in this domain of study. Over five days of deliberation, several pedagogical style lectures and focused talks on recent research results, touched on diverse important topics of this interdisciplinary and rapidly emerging field.
41 lectures were scheduled, out of which five were keynote lectures. The keynote lectures were designed to provide a pedagogical overview of the various themes, and the rest of the lectures focused on state-of-the-art and recent advances in topics such as solar-stellar magnetic variability across diverse timescales, extreme stellar (radiation and energetic particle) events, stellar winds, forcing of heliospheric and astrospheric environments, coupled evolution of star-(exo)planet systems, star-planet interactions, consequences of these phenomena on habitability and new space-and ground-based instrumentation that can further this interdisciplinary field of exploration. Separate discussion sessions were conducted to plan the review articles to be published by Space Science Reviews. A specially organised, brief session was dedicated to the memory of Maurizio Falanga, one the ISSI Directors who was helping with the organisation of this Workshop before his untimely demise.
The Workshop broadly covered the following areas:
1. Stellar variability of relevance to (exo)planets
2. Forcing of heliospheric and astrospheric environments
3. Star-planet interactions: Planetary space weather to atmospheric evolution
4. Magnetism and stellar forcing: Consequences for (exo)planetary habitability
5. Instrumentation Initiatives
Several exciting deliberations characterised the Workshop. Some of the new insights to emerge from the Workshop relate to the long-term behaviour of stellar hosts including the diversity of activity that they display, the nature and frequency of extreme stellar events and the challenges of detecting them, the impact of stellar coronal mass ejection and plasma winds on close-in hot Jupiter type planets and far-out Earth-like rocky planets, the intriguing feedback mechanisms of close-in planets on the activity of their host stars, the challenges of constraining and discovering the magnetism of exoplanets that are located far away, and the nuances of habitability in the context of magnetically mediated star-planet interactions. The Workshop highlighted many open questions and uncertainties, reinforcing that this is a field rich with exciting challenges and poised for major progress in the years to come.
As an outcome six peer-reviewed articles – written in collaboration between the participants – are being prepared for publication.
The Workshop was convened by Rim Fares (United Arab Emirates University, UAE), Silva Järvinen (AIP Potsdam, Germany), Emre Isik (MPI for Solar System Research, Germany), Heidi Korhonen (MPI for Astronomy, Germany), Co-Convener, Cristina Mandrini (IAFE, UBA-CONICET, Argentina), Dibyendu Nandi (IISER Kolkata, India), Convener and Krisztian Vida (Konkoly Observatory, Hungary).
Dibyendu Nandi
Almost four decades after the lone in-situ encounter of the Uranian system by the Voyager 2 spacecraft, our understanding of the system is still significantly lacking, with many more open questions than answers. This is increasingly true as the community sets its sights towards future exploration of the system and revisits previous analyses and conclusions armed with new insights based on orbital investigations from other planets such as Jupiter and Saturn, new modelling capabilities, and new remoted-sensing datasets from assets such as Hubble and JWST. This workshop aimed to bring together leading experts across the planetary science community to review recent results in the context of our current understanding of the Uranian system, as well as knowledge from other planetary and exoplanetary systems, to identify the major unsolved mysteries that would need to be addressed by future investigations.
Uranus presents a compelling scientific target for the planetary science community, providing a unique opportunity to explore an ice giant system with its five classical satellites, which boast drastic surface features, and a dynamically full and apparently haphazard system of rings and small moons, in addition to the planetary and magnetospheric effects of its highly tilted rotational axis being almost in Uranus’s orbital plane and its strongly multipolar intrinsic magnetic field. In particular, new results over the past few years have renewed much debate over significant outstanding questions about the system. First, it is unclear where and when the Uranus system formed. Many solar system formation models struggle to produce the current planetary configuration without strongly bound initial conditions. Similarly, questions remain as to how the planet’s dense rings and numerous moons formed and what processes dominate their dynamics, let alone how the system was affected and evolved after whatever cataclysmic event knocked the planet onto its side. Another ongoing debate surrounds whether any of the classical moons in the system may be potential ocean worlds, as a growing body of new evidence, based on a combination of the reanalysis of Voyager 2 measurements, new spectral observations from JWST, and new modelling studies, may suggest. Finally, new debate has arisen around the nature and characteristics of the Uranian magnetosphere with new results suggesting that the notably low plasma densities observed by Voyager 2 may be a result of anomalously strong solar wind pressure and/or the plasma dynamics driven by the planet’s extremely high obliquity and the strong tilt of its magnetic field.
The workshop aimed to review progress in our modern understanding of the Uranian system, based on new observations and simulations, the reanalysis of Voyager 2 data, and knowledge gained from other Giant planet systems, while also considering broader cross-disciplinary applications. The Workshop gathered 48 scientists (36 in-person and 12 remote) from 28 institutions across nine countries, including 12 early career scientists, from across multiple sub-disciplines of planetary science research. The workshop was organised to highlight the following topical areas of the Uranus system: the origin and evolution of the planet and system, the interior and deep atmosphere, the dynamo and intrinsic magnetic field, the middle atmosphere, the upper atmosphere and ionosphere, the surfaces and interiors of the classical satellites, the rings and small satellites, and the magnetosphere. Following the Workshop, a collection of comprehensive papers outlining our current understanding of the Uranian system and highlighting the outstanding mysteries that remain will be published in a volume of the Space Science Series of ISSI and as a Topical Collection in Space Science Reviews by Springer, to be organised in 16 chapters.
The Workshop was convened by (in alphabetic order) Chloe Beddingfield (JHU/APL, USA), Ian Cohen (JHU/APL, USA), Matthew Hedman (Univ. of Idaho, USA), Ravit Helled (Univ. of Zurich, Switzerland), Alice Lucchetti (INAF/OAPD, Italy), Rumi Nakamura (OEAW/IWF, Austria), Yasuhito Sekine (Institute of Science Tokyo, Japan), and Amy Simon (NASA/GSFC, USA).
Ian H. Cohen
Most solar events that influence the heliosphere (and play a significant role in space weather) develop their defining physical properties in the inner solar corona, which is located roughly between 1.5 and 5 solar radii. For almost half a century, our view of the inner corona has been limited to the delicate shimmer of white light observations made during eclipses. This has gradually changed. New missions such as PUNCH and PROBA3 have begun to offer us a new perspective on this region, and the sungrazing Parker Solar Probe satellite now flies into structures that we previously only observed in projection.
This Workshop was organised in response to the urgent need to review our understanding of the inner corona and develop a framework for describing its three-dimensional structure. Such a framework is needed to create three-dimensional, time-dependent reconstructions of the coronal density, to cross-calibrate different instruments, to help connect white-light observations to the topology of the coronal magnetic field, to make better use of new machine learning tools, and more. Additionally, we are missing a uniform description of the large collection of structures that are observed in the corona. Even defining the inner corona is a challenge.
45 participants attended the Workshop. The schedule, which left considerable time for open discussions, was organised around three questions:
1. What is the 3D morphology of the corona?
2. What are the equations of state (density, temperature, speed, magnetic field) of the inner corona?
3. How does the coronal structure evolve in scales from seconds (arcseconds) to hours (arcminutes)?
The main outcome of this Workshop is a series of seven review papers, which will be compiled into a legacy book. These reviews will provide context for the field and explore new areas. The general idea is to provide the community with a roadmap that will guide it from scattered observations towards a comprehensive understanding of the corona.
The stunning images of solar eclipses have enormous outreach potential, so a public “Astronomy on Tap” event was held at Bern railway station in conjunction with the Workshop. The event was attended by over 90 people.
This Workshop was convened by Angelos Vourlidas (APL, USA), Frédéric Auchère (IAS, France) Madhulika Guhathakurta (USA), Yeimy Rivera (CfA, USA), Marco Romoli (Univ. of Florence, Italy), Marco Velli (UCLA, USA) and| Thierry Dudok de Wit (Univ. of Orléans & ISSI).
Thierry Dudok de Wit
Earth Observation (EO) systems provide long-term, global, and systematic measurements essential to climate science. This interdisciplinary workshop, convened by the International Space Science Institute and the World Climate Research Programme’s My Climate Risk Lighthouse Activity brought together experts from climate science, EO, adaptation practice, and social sciences to assess how EO can better support local climate adaptation within an Open Science framework.
Participants emphasised that access to EO data alone does not ensure usability. At local scales, adaptation efforts face challenges related to data availability and continuity, spatial and temporal resolution, interoperability, and the translation of observations into decision-relevant information. These issues are compounded by institutional, technical, and capacity constraints, particularly in climate-vulnerable regions, risking inequities in who can effectively use EO and contributing to epistemic injustice.
The workshop moved beyond technical considerations to address governance, values, and knowledge integration. Key objectives included evaluating EO usability at local and regional scales; identifying technical, institutional, and epistemic barriers; integrating community-defined indicators and local knowledge; linking global EO data to local decision-making through approaches such as causal networks and storyline methodologies; and identifying pathways to strengthen governance, capacity, and collaboration.
Discussions highlighted both the promise and limitations of scientific EO for adaptation. While EO data are vital for understanding climate risks, ensuring their just, inclusive, and decision-relevant use requires attention to usability, equity, governance, and sustained institutional support. The workshop fostered a shared understanding of how EO can be better aligned with local adaptation needs and is informing two peer-reviewed publications on openness, indicators, case studies, and institutional structures.
Michael Rast
Breakthrough Workshops are specifically designed to address core questions in science, by gathering a diverse set of experts on the topic, inviting them to spend a week in a neutral and welcoming environment, to discuss the issues, and produce one high visibility peer reviewed paper to state the current understanding on the topic in question. The topic of the 2025 Breakthrough Workshop was: Life Beyond Earth: the missing link.
The field of exoplanet science is less than thirty years old, but in that short time, the discovery that there are planets orbiting around stars other than our Sun have revolutionised the way we see the Universe and our place in it. Since the first discovery of an exoplanet, almost 6000 exoplanets have been discovered. Thanks to new ambitious space missions and ground-based search facilities in place, the number keeps rising, with even smaller Earth-like objects being detected. Facility space observatories, like the Hubble Space Telescope, which were not originally designed to study exoplanets, creatively exploited indirect techniques such as observing the exoplanets during their transits in front of the host star, to pioneer exoplanet atmosphere studies, obtaining the first atmospheric spectra and detecting key chemical elements such as water and methane.
When JWST came online, the exquisite combination of sensitivity and resolution coupled to state-of-the-art spectroscopic capabilities opened planetary physics studies to new dimensions. Complex molecules are being detected, and the study field has grown, combining astrophysics with planetology and chemistry. The existential question on whether the Universe is full of life seems within reach of our technology and has galvanised researchers from different disciplines and research agencies. The next decades could be decisive for the corresponding disciplines, potentially marking a key moment that will see spectacular progress in our understanding of the conditions and mechanisms for the origin of life.
This Breakthrough Workshop was held at ISSI on June 16-20, 2025 and was organised around big questions centred on the theme of “life in the Universe.” The conveners were Didier Queloz (ETH), Laura Kriedberg (MPIA Heidelberg), Jonathan Lunine (NASA JPL) and Antonella Nota (ISSI).
Approximately 30 experts met in Bern to answer the questions: What planetary environment should be considered as a potential cradle for life? Starting from our own planet Earth and our own Solar System, what are the conditions necessary for life? A large number of exoplanets have been found to have atmospheres and to be located in temperate zones that are potentially habitable. The recent discovery of Hycean exoplanets, with hydrogen-rich atmosphere and oceans added new context and interest to this question. How do we search for geological and biological signatures? JWST is enabling, for the first time, accurate spectroscopic measurements of the isotopic composition of volatiles in the atmosphere of active asteroids and water-rich satellites (see for example the measurements of deuterium and carbon-13 contents on dwarf planet Eris). The return of samples from asteroids such as Bennu and others is further informing the conversation on how best to explore geological signatures. The debate on what the term “biological signature” even means in the light of the new JWST results was topic of lively debate among astronomers, astro-chemists and astro-biologists.
In a truly multidisciplinary fashion, this Breakthrough Workshop brought together experts from cognate disciplines, to interact and produce a corresponding paper on the current status of the community understanding, in relation to the questions above. The paper is close to submission.
Antonella Nota
Team Leaders: Joel Allred, NASA/GSFC, USA, and Malcolm Druett, University of Sheffield, UK
Session: 2–6 March 2026
Abstract: Understanding solar eruptions such as flares, jets, and coronal mass ejections is a central goal of space physics. New observations and advances in theory and computing now allow increasingly realistic modelling of flare processes, from global magnetic field evolution to particle acceleration and transport across vast spatial scales. While no single model captures the full multiscale complexity, several state-of-the-art codes describe complementary aspects of flare evolution. The Team systematically compares and validates leading flare models, including MPI AMRVAC, MURaM, Bifrost, and RADYN plus FP, using multi wavelength observations to test their predictions. By identifying key physical processes and methodological gaps, we aim to guide the development of next generation end-to-end flare models and strengthen the interpretation of new solar observations.
Team Leader: Juan Antonio Añel, Universidade de Vigo, Spain
Session: 14–18 September 2026
Abstract: The mounting evidence of climate change’s impacts on the middle and upper atmosphere highlights the urgent need for observational data to monitor and understand these trends. In this regard, numerous critical scientific questions remain unanswered, emphasising the necessity for additional research and international cooperation in this area. Current challenges in satellite monitoring of the middle and upper atmosphere over the next decade are concerning, particularly owing to limited data series available for these layers. To address these issues, the goals of the Team are to advance the study of climate change in the middle and upper atmosphere, enhance data availability, and devise strategies for evaluating and monitoring climate change through satellite observations. The Team comprises a diverse group of international experts covering diverse atmospheric layers, including the stratosphere, thermosphere, and ionosphere, as well as aspects of space debris and Earth observation.
Team Leaders: Karl Battams and Matthew Knight, United States Naval Academy, USA
Session: To be scheduled
Abstract: The Geminid meteor shower is one of the most intense annual showers, yet its origin remains puzzling. Unlike most showers linked to comets, its parent body, asteroid (3200) Phaethon, appears asteroidal in nature, raising questions about how the Phaethon–Geminid system formed and evolved. Recent heliophysics spacecraft observations have revealed new details of Phaethon’s activity, including the first white-light detections of the Geminid stream core. Together with the upcoming JAXA DESTINY+ mission encounter in the early 2030s, these discoveries make a comprehensive reassessment timely. The Team gathers experts in heliophysics imaging, small bodies, meteoroid streams, and dust properties to synthesise recent advances, redefine key questions, and produce an authoritative, up to date study of the Phaethon–Geminid system.
Team Leaders: Yulia Bogdanova, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK, and Simon Wing, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, USA
Session: 23–27 March 2026
Abstract: Earth’s magnetospheric cusps are key entry points for solar wind plasma through magnetic reconnection, controlling energy and plasma transfer into the magnetosphere and ionosphere. Despite extensive study, important questions remain about their multiscale structure and variability. This project brings together experts in data analysis and modeling to investigate small- and medium-scale plasma fluctuations, longitudinal variability linked to reconnection geometry, and the impact of asymmetries in the magnetosheath and magnetosphere on energy transport. The Team uses coordinated observations from Cluster, THEMIS or MMS, and low-altitude missions such as DMSP and Swarm. The results will improve understanding of solar wind magnetosphere ionosphere coupling and help define science priorities for future missions including TRACERS, SMILE, and Bepi Colombo.
Team Leaders: Martina Bramberger, NCAR, USA, and Corwin Wright, University of Bath, UK
Session: 11–15 May 2026
Abstract: For the last twenty years we have been able to monitor stratospheric dynamics in extraordinary detail, facilitated by an effective and comprehensive high-resolution global satellite measurement network. However, this network is aging and will likely be entirely gone by the late 2020s, with no current plans to replace it. This is a major problem for the continuing development of weather and climate models, an increasingly large fraction of which incorporate a resolved high-resolution stratosphere. While missions are currently under consideration by both NASA and ESA to fill this gap, they are yet to be approved and even if selected would not launch until the mid-2030s. In WAVE-GAP, the Team identifies and comprehensively assess a range of approaches to filling this data gap, including the use of lower-resolution satellites, ground-based and in-situ observations, dynamical modelling and ML/AI approaches. The researchers focus on the specific case of small-scale atmospheric gravity waves playing a key role in atmospheric dynamics, using these as a test bed to develop robust and adaptable solutions to the lack of observations. Building on this example, the Team further aims to produce broad recommendations which will be transferable to other atmospheric dynamical and chemical variables affected by the gap.
Team Leader: Jeremy Dargent, École Polytechnique, France
Session: 23–27 February 2026
Abstract: The Team investigates how ionospheric plasma is energised as it travels through the magnetosphere. Magnetospheric plasma originates from both the solar wind and the ionosphere, but ionospheric plasma starts at much lower energies and is often below instrument detection thresholds despite its significant density. To understand its global evolution, the Team members combine large scale magnetohydrodynamic simulations with local kinetic studies and spacecraft observations. Global models will identify regions where significant heating is expected, while kinetic simulations and measurements will characterise the responsible processes. Our goal is to provide, for each major ionospheric plasma source, a comprehensive description of its transport and energisation throughout the magnetosphere.
Team Leaders: Mark Gieles, ICREA & University of Barcelona, Spain, and Paolo Padoan, Dartmouth College & University of Barcelona, USA
Session: 13–17 April 2026
Abstract: Globular clusters (GCs) are dense stellar systems, with ages comparable to the age of the Universe, which are found in nearly all galaxies. Thanks to the revolutionary observations of the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) and follow-up spectroscopy from the ground, we discovered that most stars in GCs have anomalous abundances, in the form of increased helium abundances and variations in other light elements. These abundances are telltales of hydrogen burning at temperatures well in excess of the central temperatures of the stars themselves. All old GCs display these “multiple populations” (MPs), but they have remained elusive in young massive clusters and their origin is shrouded in mystery. A long-standing question that this proposal aims to address is: “What is the origin of these anomalous light-element abundances?” The Team investigates the scenario in which extremely massive stars (~103 solar masses) – that may have existed in GCs in the early Universe – polluted GCs during their formation. The novelty lies in the combination of hitherto disconnected approaches, using space- and ground-based observations, stellar evolution and nucleosynthesis calculations and direct modelling of GC formation. This project sheds light on the formation of GCs at high redshift and provide insights into fundamental problems in astrophysics, such as the stellar initial mass function (IMF) and star and galaxy formation at high redshift. Solving this problem now is timely given our ability to directly observe GC formation in the earliest phases of galaxy formation with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST).
eam Leaders: Laurent Gizon, Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Germany, and Rhita-Maria Ouazzani, Observatoire de Paris, France
Session: 5–9 October 2026
Abstract: Recent advances in solar and stellar physics reveal that inertial modes, global oscillations driven by the Coriolis force, provide powerful probes of internal structure and rotation. In the Sun, long time series have identified rich spectra of inertial modes, including high latitude modes that help maintain the observed pole to equator temperature contrast. In intermediate mass stars, gravito-inertial and Rossby modes detected by Kepler constrain core rotation, stratification, and magnetic activity, while broader stellar samples show characteristic features linked to unresolved modes. These results establish inertial modes as key diagnostics of stellar interiors and convection. However, research in the solar and stellar communities has largely progressed separately. The Team unites experts from both fields to exchange methods, develop joint analyses, and advance a unified understanding of inertial modes across stars.
Team Leaders: Kseniia Golubenko, University of Oulu, Finland, and Hella Wittmann, GFZ Potsdam, Germany
Session: 26–30 January 2026
Abstract: Beryllium-10 is produced by cosmic rays in the atmosphere and preserved in ice cores, sediments, and soils, making it a key proxy for past solar activity, cosmic ray flux, geomagnetic changes, and extreme solar events. However, interpreting Beryllium-10 records is challenging because atmospheric transport, stratospheric circulation, and climate variability also influence its deposition, introducing uncertainties in reconstructions of solar cycles and extreme solar energetic particle events. The Team combines expertise in solar physics, atmospheric science, and isotope geochemistry to refine Beryllium-10 as a quantitative solar proxy. By integrating high resolution records with advanced atmospheric transport models, we will reassess known extreme events such as those in 774 CE and 993 CE and search for previously unidentified events. The project aims to improve reconstructions of past solar variability and better constrain the risks of future extreme solar activity.
Team Leader: Mario Guarcello, INAF, Italy
Session: 9–13 March 2026
Abstract: Star formation occurs in a wide variety of environments. The understanding of star formation in the solar neighbourhood is biased toward low-mass star-forming regions (typically hosting a few hundred to a few thousand members) with solar metallicity (i.e., an abundance of chemical elements heavier than hydrogen and helium similar to that of the Sun). This is unfortunate, as a significant fraction of stars form in massive star-forming regions, which host rich populations of massive stars. These stars regulate the formation of low-mass stars and their planets through their intense high-energy radiation and stellar winds. As a result, the outcomes of the star formation process and the early stellar evolution in massive environments can differ from those in low-mass regions. Additionally, the metallicity of the star-forming region is expected to play a crucial role. Exploring star formation at low metallicity is particularly important, as it provides insights into the products of star formation in the early epochs of cosmic evolution when metallicity was low and star formation was especially intense. The project aims to fully exploit the capabilities of the James Webb Space Telescope to determine the efficiency of very low-mass star formation and their early evolution in the most massive young stellar clusters in the Milky Way, as well as in low-metallicity environments in the Magellanic Clouds. The exceptional performance of JWST is essential, as both massive and low-metallicity star-forming environments are located at large distances from us and are typically affected by significant interstellar extinction (especially the former).
Team Leaders: Miroslav Hanzelka, GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Germany, and Oliver Allanson, University of Birmingham, UK
Session: 3–7 November 2025
Abstract: Advances in plasma theory during the 1950s and 1960s led to the development of comprehensive models of Earth’s radiation belts capable of describing and forecasting many observational phenomena. These early models, developed with sparse and technically limited wave and particle measurements, were based on quasi-linear theory, treating particle transport as purely diffusive. However, recent high-fidelity spacecraft data (collected by Cluster, THEMIS, Van Allen Probes, Arase, MMS, SAMPEX, POES, GPS, CubeSat missions, and others) have repeatedly challenged this modelling approach, revealing discrepancies that highlight the need to incorporate non-diffusive irreversible processes that take place on small timescales. Addressing these gaps requires tackling fundamental questions on nonlinear particle acceleration, transport, and loss. These advancements are critical not only for improving model accuracy but also for addressing societally important challenges, including forecasting radiation hazards in the near-Earth space environment and understanding the impact of energetic particle loss on the atmosphere. This project brings together a diverse team of leading international experts to: (i) unify current knowledge of relativistic particle dynamics in the radiation belts; (ii) investigate key processes beyond classical diffusion, such as radial advection and nonlinear wave-driven acceleration; and (iii) provide recommendations for future spacecraft missions to enable critical breakthroughs in radiation belt research.
Team Leaders: Laura Hayes, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, Ireland, and Hannah Collier, FHNW, Switzerland
Session: 20–24 April 2026
Abstract: Solar Orbiter’s Major Flare Solar Orbiter Observing Plan (SOOP) campaign has provided unprecedented datasets to investigate how solar flares release energy, accelerate particles, and heat plasma in the solar atmosphere. Successfully conducted in 2024, capturing over 22 flares, and with another campaign planned for 2025, these observations captured high-cadence, high-resolution flare data resolving rapid plasma evolution on fine spatial and temporal scales. The campaign leveraged extreme ultraviolet (EUV) imaging from the High-Resolution Imager (HRIEUV) on the Extreme-Ultraviolet Imager, which operated in short-exposure mode to provide 2-second-cadence, non-saturated EUV flare observations, offering an unparalleled view of flare ribbons and loop dynamics. Simultaneously, hard X-ray imaging spectroscopy from STIX provided continuous measurements of flare energy release and particle acceleration, enabling a multi-wavelength investigation of energy transport and reconnection processes. Additionally, SPICE captured spectroscopic flare plasma observations at multiple temperatures in selected events, further constraining energy deposition and the atmospheric response. This Team brings together an international group of experts to fully exploit these datasets, with three key aims:
(1) develop optimised data analysis techniques and create community resources, including catalogues, pre-processed datasets, and documentation;
(2) analyse high-cadence Solar Orbiter observations of flare ribbons and loop dynamics to investigate energy transport;
(3) and refine observing strategies for future Solar Orbiter campaigns and next-generation missions like MUSE and Solar-C.
By combining observational data-driven analysis and strategic planning, this team will maximise the scientific return of Solar Orbiter’s major flare campaigns, and address fundamental questions about how flares release energy, accelerate particles, and heat plasma in the solar atmosphere.
Team Leader: Daniel Hestroffer, Observatoire de Paris, France
Session: 16–20 February 2026
Abstract: Small bodies beyond Neptune – from Trans-Neptunian Objects to the Oort cloud – trace the formation and dynamical evolution of the outer Solar System. Their orbits reflect the combined influence of giant planets, stellar encounters, and the Galactic potential as the Solar System moves through the Milky Way. The Team aims to quantify how this stellar and galactic environment has shaped the Outermost Solar System over 4.5 Gyr. By combining new observational constraints (including Gaia and forthcoming Rubin/LSST surveys) with dedicated N-body simulations, we will model the long-term evolution of distant small bodies and compare predictions with observed orbital distributions. This interdisciplinary effort will provide new constraints on the Solar System’s birth environment and on the formation and structure of the Oort cloud.
Team Leaders: Allison Jaynes, University of Iowa, USA, and Lynn Harvey, LASP University of Colorado, USA
Session: 23–27 March 2026
Abstract: Energetic auroral precipitation, particularly from pulsating aurora, produces nitric oxides (NOx) in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere. During polar night, NOx can descend into the stratosphere – enhanced by the polar vortex and modulated by planetary waves – where it catalytically destroys ozone, sometimes causing months-long depletion after a single strong event. However, the overlap between regional auroral NOx sources, planetary wave structure, and vortex dynamics remains poorly quantified. Current models underestimate NOx production and transport, although high-resolution WACCM-X simulations show that resolved gravity waves significantly enhance descent. Coarse-resolution models still miss this effect, limiting our understanding of Sun–Earth coupling. The project aims to determine how the atmospheric state controls the impact of energetic electron precipitation on ozone and middle-atmosphere chemistry.
Team Leaders: Larry Kepko, NASA, USA, and Sara Gasparini, University of Bergen, Norway
Session: 2–6 February 2026
Abstract: Earth’s magnetosphere couples to the ionosphere through field-aligned currents (FACs) and particle precipitation, shaping ionospheric conductivity and dynamics. While large-scale current systems are well known, mesoscale structures (tens to hundreds of kilometres, minutes in duration) remain poorly understood owing to observational limitations. The new EZIE mission will provide 2D maps of ionospheric currents, revealing the temporal evolution of mesoscale systems, but lacks in-situ measurements. Conversely, Swarm delivers precise FAC and convection data without the broader context of imaging. Combined with new high-resolution ground-based datasets (e.g., SuperDARN, TREx) and data-assimilation tools such as Lompe, there is now an unprecedented opportunity to resolve mesoscale auroral electrodynamics. The Team integrates space- and ground-based observations to advance understanding of mesoscale magnetosphere–ionosphere coupling.
Team Leaders: Amir Khan and Paolo Sossi, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
Session: 23–27 February 2026
Abstract: The structure and composition of planetary crusts, mantles, and cores provide key insights into their thermal state, chemistry, origin, and evolution. Recent advances, including improved seismic models suggesting a denser Earth outer core, machine-learning approaches to interior properties, and more precise laboratory measurements, offer new opportunities to refine models of terrestrial planet interiors, from Earth and Mars to the Moon and Vesta. The Team combines seismology, geophysics, mineral physics, and geo- and cosmochemistry to better constrain the structure and formation of rocky planets. Using data from ground- and space-based missions (e.g., LAGEOS, InSight, Apollo), the results will also support upcoming missions such as BepiColombo and the lunar Farside Seismic Suite, with implications extending to exoplanetary systems.
Team Leader: Solene Lejosne, University of California Berkeley, USA
Session: 16–20 March 2026
Abstract: Drift phase structures appear as organised peaks and valleys in radiation belt spectrograms and are now recognised as a common feature of planetary radiation belts. Although they are generally linked to radial transport, their origin remains debated. They may result from impulsive electric field perturbations, producing drift echoes, or from drift resonance with ultra-low-frequency waves. The relative importance and efficiency of these mechanisms are still unclear, as is their overall impact on global radiation belt dynamics. This project combines satellite observations with theoretical and numerical modelling to determine the dominant generation processes of drift phase structures. The researchers also quantify their role in radiation belt acceleration and validate model results against observations to improve current radiation belt paradigms.
Team Leaders: Zhaosheng Li, Xiangtan University, China, and Duncan Galloway, Monash University, Australia
Session: To be scheduled
Abstract: Thermonuclear X-ray bursts result from unstable nuclear burning of material accreted onto a neutron star from a companion via Roche lobe overflow. Renewed interest in these events is driven by new multi wavelength observations, discoveries of previously unknown burst behaviour, and data from recent missions such as NICER, Insight-HXMT, and NinjaSat. Different burning regimes produce short bursts, intermediate-duration bursts, and superbursts. Studying these events probes nuclear reaction physics and constrains neutron star masses, radii, and the equation of state. This project integrates multi wavelength observations, laboratory experiments, and numerical simulations to understand burst mechanisms, burst disk interactions, and their connection to jet production.
Team Leaders: Manuela Lippi, INAF, Italy, and Geronimo Villanueva, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, USA
Session: 9–13 February 2026
Abstract: The relative abundance of nuclear spin configurations in multi-hydrogenated molecules such as H2O, H2, H2CO, and NH3 depends on formation temperature. Because spin states cannot easily change after formation, spin ratios have long been used as cosmogonic thermometers to infer formation conditions in the interstellar medium, protoplanetary disks, and comets. However, growing observational datasets and improved modelling have revealed discrepancies that question the reliability of spin temperatures. Nuclear spin conversion may occur in some environments, such as cometary comae or during ice processing in disks and the interstellar medium. The Team updates the spin temperature datasets, incorporate recent results including JWST observations, reassess laboratory and theoretical constraints, and clarify how spin ratios should be interpreted in the context of planet formation.
Team Leaders: Honghui Liu, University of Tübingen, Germany
Session: 20–24 April 2026
Abstract: Accreting black holes emit radiation across the electromagnetic spectrum, with X-rays arising from the innermost regions near the event horizon. X-ray spectroscopy and timing have greatly advanced our understanding of accretion processes, but model degeneracies and uncertain emission geometries limit our ability to answer key questions, such as the distribution of black hole spins. The launch of IXPE in 2021 reopened the X-ray polarimetry window, providing geometry-sensitive measurements that can break these degeneracies. While IXPE has already delivered important results for accreting black holes, a comprehensive framework integrating spectral, timing, and polarimetric data is still missing. This Team develops such a synergy framework and addresses new puzzles raised by IXPE, combining expertise in observations, theory, modelling, and simulations.
Team Leaders: Mihailo Martinovic, University of Arizona, USA, and Rodrigo Lopez, Research Center in the Intersection of Plasma Physics, Matter, and Complexity (P2mc), Chile
Session: 6–10 July 2026
Abstract: The solar wind is a natural laboratory for space plasma physics. In-situ measurements show that nonthermal features in particle velocity distribution functions, such as ion beams, are shaped by wave-particle interactions that drive the plasma toward quasi-steady non-equilibrium states. While linear, quasi-linear, and nonlinear theories describe many relevant processes, their relative importance in the evolving solar wind remains poorly constrained by observations. With high-resolution data from Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter, including the former’s closest perihelion at 9.5 solar radii, we can now test these theories in the young solar wind. This project will unite experts in theory, simulations, and observations to determine how multiscale plasma models can explain solar wind evolution. The Team compares proton and alpha particle populations with linear and quasi-linear predictions, and use particles in cell and hybrid simulations to link small-scale kinetics with large-scale expansion effects, advancing multiscale models of the inner heliosphere.
Team Leaders: Christopher Piecuch, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, USA, and Julius Oelsmann, Tulane University, USA
Session: 19–23 January 2026
Abstract: Changes in the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) and sea level are major risks of global warming. A weakened AMOC could alter heat transport, storms, rainfall, and temperatures, while sea level rise threatens coasts. Because ocean circulation and sea level are closely linked, understanding their past relationship is essential for reliable future projections. Models suggest the AMOC may decline or even collapse this century, enhancing sea level rise along North Atlantic coasts. However, direct AMOC observations are short and sparse, leaving no robust benchmark to evaluate historical simulations and future projections. The Team combines observations, modelling, and theory to clarify the AMOC-sea level link and assess how satellite sea level data can improve ocean monitoring. This timely effort helps constrain past AMOC changes and refine projections of climate impacts.
Team Leaders: Marco Pinto, Laboratory fo Instrumentation and Experimental Particle Physics, Portugal, and Laura Rodríguez-García, European Space Agency, Spain
Session: 6–10 July 2026
Abstract: Solar energetic particles (SEPs) are intense bursts of protons, electrons, and ions accelerated in solar flares and coronal mass ejection shocks, reaching energies up to GeV. They pose serious risks to space exploration by damaging electronics, endangering astronauts, and disrupting planetary atmospheres. At Mars, SEPs can trigger global auroras and cause prolonged radio blackouts, threatening communication for future robotic and crewed missions. The mechanisms driving these disruptions, especially the role of different particle populations, remain unclear. The investigates how SEPs are accelerated and propagate from the Sun to Mars, and how they affect the Martian atmosphere and ionosphere. By combining expertise in particle physics, atmospheric science, instrumentation, and modelling, the Team aims to assess SEP impacts and improve space weather preparedness for Mars exploration.
Team Leaders: Francesco Pucci, CNR-ISTP, Italy, and Giulia Cozzani, LPC2E, CNRS, France
Session: 6–10 July 2026
Abstract: The heliosphere contains the turbulent solar wind, a plasma flow shaped by the Sun’s magnetic field. Turbulence plays a central role in energy dissipation, magnetic reconnection, particle acceleration, and shock dynamics. Yet, most global simulations of solar wind–planet interactions still treat the solar wind as laminar, despite clear observational evidence of its turbulent nature. A new 3D global kinetic code, Menura, now enables realistic simulations of the turbulent solar wind interacting with planetary magnetospheres. The Team combines such simulations with spacecraft observations to investigate how turbulence affects bow shocks, foreshock and magnetosheath regions, and overall magnetospheric dynamics in the Solar System and beyond. The project aims to constrain the role of turbulence in wind–planet interactions and advance both planetary and exoplanetary research.
Team Leaders: Nithin Sivadas, Catholic University of America, USA, and Maria-Theresia Walach, Lancaster University, UK
Session: 27 April–2 May 2026
Abstract: Geomagnetic indices, used to quantify solar-wind-driven geomagnetic activity, appear to saturate during extreme solar wind conditions. The cause of this nonlinear response is unclear and may reflect uncertainties in solar wind measurements rather than true physical saturation. If so, the geomagnetic impact of extreme space weather events could be underestimated. As solar maximum approaches and the likelihood of severe storms increases, the Team focuses on two key questions: what drives the observed nonlinear geomagnetic response, and how does geomagnetic activity respond to extreme solar wind parameters? By analysing a comprehensive database of solar wind data and geomagnetic indices, the researchers determine whether the apparent saturation is real or a statistical artifact. This work will improve understanding of extreme space weather and strengthen preparedness for future geomagnetic storms.
Team Leader: Alessio Spurio Mancini, Royal Holloway University of London, UK
Session: 19–22 January 2026
Abstract: Euclid is ESA’s flagship cosmology mission, launched in 2023 to map the distances, shapes, and positions of 1.5 billion galaxies over the past 10 billion years. A cornerstone of its science programme is the joint analysis of weak lensing and photometric galaxy clustering, known as the 3x2pt method, which enables precise tests of the standard cosmological model. To fully exploit Euclid Data Release 1, advanced modelling of systematics and improved inference methods are required. This project unites experts in data analysis, theory, statistics, and machine learning to develop optimised tools for the 3x2pt analysis. The initiative delivers high-impact publications, open software, and robust methodologies for future large scale surveys, maximising the scientific return of Euclid and strengthening the cosmology community.
Team Leader: Domenico Trotta, European Space Agency ESAC
Session: 13–17 July 2026
Abstract: Collisionless plasmas throughout the Universe contain suprathermal particle populations that extend beyond the thermal distribution. In the solar wind, electrons form four populations: a thermal core, an isotropic halo, a field aligned strahl up to about 2 keV, and a persistent higher-energy superhalo above about 2 keV whose origin remains unknown. Understanding the superhalo is key to explaining how electrons are injected into suprathermal energies and prepared for further acceleration. With new high-resolution measurements from Solar Orbiter, complemented by Parker Solar Probe and missions at 1 AU such as Wind and STEREO, we can now investigate this population in unprecedented detail. The Team combines observations and modelling to determine the origin of the electron superhalo and its evolution from the Sun to 1 AU.
Team Leaders: Sergey Tsygankov, University of Turku, Finland, and Roberto Taverna, University of Padova, Italy
Session: 9–13 February 2026
Abstract: Neutron stars are natural laboratories for extreme physics, where accretion, radiation, and strong magnetic fields interact. X-ray polarimetry was expected to clarify emission mechanisms and geometry, but recent observations from IXPE have revealed unexpected complexities that challenge current models. A major open issue is how to properly include quantum electrodynamics effects and radiation propagation in models of magnetar and X-ray pulsar atmospheres, where different approaches remain in disagreement. With next-generation X-ray polarimeters such as eXTP planned within the next five years, it is crucial to establish a robust theoretical and observational framework. This effort will help resolve current discrepancies and ensure accurate interpretation of future polarimetric data.
Team Leaders: Peter Wyper, Durham University, UK, and Joel Dahlin, University of Maryland, USA
Session: 11–15 May 2026
Abstract: Flare ribbons are chromospheric brightenings produced by energy deposition from particles accelerated during magnetic reconnection in solar flares. They display complex fine-scale structures that may provide key diagnostics of the reconnection process, yet their origin and interpretation remain unclear. This Team – combining observers and modellers – systematically characterises ribbon fine structure, assesses how well current models reproduce it, and determine what it reveals about coronal reconnection and energy release. The Team also defines new observational and modelling strategies to advance the field. This effort is timely given new high-resolution datasets from ground-based and space missions and increasingly realistic flare simulations that now reproduce ribbon fine structure.
Team Leaders: Mengyuan Xiao, University of Geneva, Switzerland, and Rohan Naidu, MIT, USA
Session: 2–6 February 2026
Abstract: The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has revealed a population of compact, red high-redshift sources known as Little Red Dots. These objects show broad Balmer lines, unusual V-shaped spectral energy distributions, and diverse properties that defy clear classification. They may represent the earliest growing black holes or extremely compact, massive galaxies, but no consensus has yet emerged. The Team combines multiwavelength observations, theoretical modelling, and JWST expertise to determine the nature of these sources. Using JWST archival data, dedicated programmes, and complementary observations from ALMA and Chandra, the researchers characterise their emission, environments, and possible active galactic nucleus signatures. Through focused meetings, the Team develops new analysis methods and refines models to clarify the role of Little Red Dots in early galaxy evolution and black hole growth.
Team Leaders: Andrzej Zdziarski, Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center, Poland, and Alexandra Veledina, University of Turku, Finland
Session: 13–17 April 2026
Abstract: Black holes are defined by mass, charge, and spin, with spin ranging from zero to maximal rotation. Recent observations reveal a striking discrepancy: black holes in merging binaries detected by LIGO Virgo typically have low spins around 0.1, while those in accreting X-ray binaries often show high spins above 0.7, with many near maximal rotation. This tension challenges current models of black hole formation and evolution. The Team investigates three possible explanations: different formation channels for merging and accreting systems, systematic biases in X-ray spin measurements, and spin up through accretion during binary evolution. By bringing together experts in black hole formation, binary evolution, and accretion physics, the researchers analyse recent multi messenger data and refine theoretical models to establish reliable benchmarks for black hole spin estimates.
Europe has a large and highly active heliophysics community. However, this community has historically been subdivided into various groups and areas, such as neutral-charged atmospheric interactions, ionospheres, magnetospheres, the solar wind, and solar and planetary plasmas. This diversity has sometimes made communication and collaboration between these groups unwieldy, even though fundamental plasma physics and techniques are a common thread.
The aim of the Forum on “Towards building a European Heliophysics Community and advancing the multi-disciplinary field of heliophysics research” was to discuss ways to advance heliospheric science by improving communication and coordination between those working in the aforementioned sub-disciplines and by setting up a European Heliophysics Community (EHC) body to better communicate with and support European scientists, especially early-career ones.
The Forum brought together 21 researchers. The main task was to pave the way for the establishment of an EHC, which involved identifying the relevant disciplines, discussing the optimal structure, addressing modes of interaction with existing initiatives, and planning concrete actions. The Forum’s format was ideally suited to this, as it enabled open, free-flowing — and often intense — discussions.
The first tangible outcomes of the forum are a white paper with recommendations [Nakamura et al., Annales Geophysicae 43 (2025) doi: 10.5194/angeo-43-855-2025], a community website, and a series of sessions that have or will be organised at scientific meetings.
The main actions or recommendations are:
– Set up low-threshold communication channels with a mailing list, a regular newsletter, a Linked-In account, etc.
– Give special attention to early-career researchers, to train them and help them establish their professional network. For that reason, a series of HelioMeet webinars has been initiated;
– Because heliophysics is connected to many other fields of science, there is a special need to facilitate information exchange on data sources, facilities, and tools;
– Likewise, to enable interdisciplinary heliophysics, data and software must be recognised as critical scientific outputs;
– Encourage outreach activities, with the systematic use of the keywords “Heliophysics” and “EHC” to increase the discipline’s visibility and foster community cohesion.
Following this Forum, a low-overhead approach structure with four working groups has been set up. The next major community event will be the EHC workshop that will take place at ESTEC on 21-25 September 2026.
This Forum was convened by Rumi Nakamura (IWF/OEAW, Austria & ISSI), Geraint Jones (ESA), and Thierry Dudok de Wit (Univ. of Orléans & ISSI).
Thierry Dudok de Wit
The Forum gathered 24 participants from China, France, Italy, Poland and USA, 21 in-person and 3 online. There was a mix of ocean colour specialists, lidar instrumentation developers, and atmospheric lidar specialists from academia and private companies.
The Forum consisted in a mix of presentations on ocean colour, lidar applications and lidar instrumentation development. Private companies developing lidars were invited to present their solutions. Five main topics were tackled leading to recommendations and proposals for Actions.
The first topic concerned the Lidar instrumentation development. Four recommendations were made: 1) There is a high interest in developing a network of oceanic profiling lidar; 2) Preference for a ship-borne lidar or at fixed stations; 3) Minimum requirements should be defined as a community; 4) Need to better define the objectives and the scientific questions.
The second topic concerned the objectives and the scientific questions of this network. Four recommendations were proposed: 1) The National Science Foundations and the space agencies need to provide clear pathways for funding dedicated to the development of oceanic profiling lidar and such a network; 2) Possibilities to install lidars on ship of opportunities and research vessels, whereby lidars should be installed alongside other sensors when possible (Ferrybox, ADCP); 3) Create an excel sheet for discussing different configurations of an oceanic profiling lidar; 4) Create a Task Force to look deeper at the technical characteristics from different communities.
The third topic concerned Lidar algorithms. Two recommendations were proposed: 1) Efforts are still necessary to improve the existing algorithms and 2) Inter-comparisons of lidar algorithms should be developed for a better understanding of their limitations and for further improvements. These recommendations led to a proposed Action: To develop a round-robin comparison of the algorithms on the basis of real and synthetic lidar and OC data.
The fourth topic concerned the data. Two actions were proposed: 1) Create a Task Force to develop a protocol on how to perform and process ship-borne lidar measurements; 2) To share the codes of current simulators
Lastly the topic concerning training and knowledge transfer was discussed. Two recommendations were proposed: 1) Need to attract optical and lidar engineers to the ocean colour community; 2) Need to develop summer schools dedicated to oceanic lidar. These recommendations led to one proposed Action: Train new generation of scientists on the data processing of lidar. The participants will try to organise a follow-up meeting at ISSI or at another venue.
Cederic Jamet
The minor planet populations of the outer solar system, including trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs), Centaurs, Trojans, irregular satellites, and comets, preserve crucial evidence from the epoch of planet formation. Their orbital distributions, surface compositions, and physical properties record the dynamical history of the giant planets and the processes that have shaped the solar system over billions of years.
Over the past two decades, models of giant planet instability and migration have successfully reproduced many observed features of the outer solar system. At the same time, several key observations remain difficult to explain within this framework alone. These include the properties of detached objects such as Sedna, the possible clustering of extreme trans-Neptunian objects, relative numbers of objects in mean-motion resonances, and aspects of the Oort Cloud structure. Alternative or complementary mechanisms, such as perturbations from a distant massive planet, stellar flybys, or the Sun’s birth cluster environment, have therefore been proposed.
The Forum aimed to evaluate how current observations support, constrain, or challenge these different dynamical scenarios. The Forum brought together experts in dynamical modelling, stellar encounters, galactic dynamics, and observations of orbital, surface, and physical properties of outer solar system bodies. Particular emphasis was placed on defining observational tests that can distinguish between competing models in the era of large surveys such as Rubin Observatory’s LSST and facilities such as JWST and the ELTs.
The main themes discussed included:
• The current dynamical architecture of the trans-Neptunian region and its implications for giant planet migration and instability models.
• The Planet Nine hypothesis and rogue planet scenarios: expected dynamical signatures and testable predictions.
• The role of stellar flybys, galactic tides, and the Sun’s birth environment in shaping the Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud.
• The formation and evolution of the Oort Cloud as inferred from the dynamics of long-period comets.
• The impact of collisional, thermal, and irradiation processes on the surface and physical properties of outer solar system bodies.
• The diagnostic power of size distributions, binary fractions, rotational properties, spectral diversity and relative numbers across dynamical populations.
• Observational strategies and survey priorities that can provide decisive constraints in the next decade.
The Forum gathered 25 participants from multiple countries and research communities, including experts in numerical simulations, small-body dynamics, stellar dynamics, spectroscopy, photometry, and survey science. The programme was structured around thematic sessions combining invited talks and extended discussions. This format encouraged direct comparison between models and data, and fostered collaboration across disciplinary boundaries.
The discussions highlighted both areas of agreement and persistent uncertainties. There is broad consensus that planetesimal formation by streaming instability provides a common starting point, and that giant planet migration played a central role in shaping the trans-Neptunian region. However, the origin of detached objects and the detailed structure of the inner Oort Cloud remain open questions. Participants identified specific observables, such as resonance occupation statistics, the orbital distribution of long-period comets, binary survival rates, and correlations between colour and dynamical class, that offer strong discriminatory power between models.
A central outcome of the Forum is a structured review paper that connects dynamical models, physical processes, and observable properties of outer solar system populations. The paper will outline a set of prioritised observational tests designed to exploit forthcoming data from LSST, JWST, ELTs, and complementary ground-based programmes. By clarifying which measurements are most diagnostic, the Forum aims to guide both observational campaigns and theoretical developments over the coming decade.
Rosita Kokotanekova
The plasma state is by far the most common state of visible matter in the Universe. Plasmas are partially or fully ionised gases that exhibit interesting collective behaviour. Examples for space and astrophysical plasmas include the solar wind, planetary magnetospheres, stars, the interstellar medium, accretion discs around compact objects, and even the gas between galaxies in galaxy clusters. In addition to a strong general interest in the fundamental physics of plasmas as complex systems, plasmas also have a high technological value. Therefore, plasma physics is also actively studied in laboratory environments on Earth.
This interdisciplinary Forum brought together world-leading experts in space plasma physics and laboratory plasma physics to explore and discuss the synergies between both research strands and scientific communities. Given the breadth of the realm of plasma physics, these two communities often operate very independently and with limited interaction across discipline borders.
However, our common interest in the discovery and understanding of fundamental processes in complex plasma systems offers great opportunities for cross-fertilisation and bi-directional exchange of ideas, the exploration of common themes and concepts, and the sharing of experience in the application of diagnostic techniques and measurement tools. The central goals of this Forum were the breaking down of barriers between the communities and the opening of pathways towards more detailed and larger-scale, synergistic follow-on research projects and collaborations.
The scientific scope of our Forum lain in the physics of fundamental processes that can play a significant role in defining the behaviour of both space and laboratory plasmas. These processes include, amongst others, magnetic reconnection, turbulence and waves, nonequilibrium effects and instabilities, shocks, Coulomb collisions, dynamo effects, and heat conduction.
The Forum gathered 21 participants (18 face-to-face and three remotely) from nine countries, including four early-career researchers from both the space and laboratory plasma communities. We extensively discussed the synergies between both communities by brainstorming over the following Guiding Questions:
• How can laboratory plasma experiments inform our understanding of fundamental space-plasma processes?
• How can space-plasma observations inform the design and interpretation of laboratory plasma experiments?
• Which diagnostic methods and techniques are transferrable between both research communities?
The discussions revealed great commonalities between the involved research communities and exciting opportunities for future collaborations across discipline boundaries. Although some plasma conditions and parameters make a direct comparison between space and laboratory systems challenging, we found that an appropriate scaling between both environments can often help us explore the same plasma processes and physics. Moreover, we discovered great commonalities in terms of novel diagnostic approaches that can be used to measure charged particles and electromagnetic fields in natural and artificial plasmas. It became clear that both communities will significantly benefit from cross-disciplinary interactions like this Forum. By learning from each other, we can maximise the potential to drive forward our fundamental understanding of plasma physics that is important both in space and on Earth.
Following the Forum, a white paper on the synergies between space and laboratory plasma physics will be published in the journal Reports on Progress in Physics. The Forum was convened by Daniel Verscharen (University College London), Sara Molisani (University of Padova), Matteo Zuin (Consorzio RFX and CNR/ISTP Padova), and Rumi Nakamura (IWF/OEAW and ISSI).
Daniel Verscharen and Rumi Nakamura
Climate extremes are the primary channel through which societies experience the impacts of climate change, and recent years have witnessed a marked increase in their frequency, severity, and spatial extent. Characterising and understanding the occurrence of current extreme weather events, their drivers and interactions shed light on what to expect in the near future, especially with respect to unprecedented extremes, and which are the implications for climate adaptation. The Forum was aimed at discussing these major questions related to changing weather and climate extremes under global warming.
The Forum gathered over 20 scientists with complementary expertise in Earth observation, climate data analyses and statistics, and data and numerical modelling. The discussions held during the meeting identified the key scientific challenges and research priorities associated with the detection, attribution, and anticipation of the most impactful and unprecedented extremes. The participants examined how climate extremes are responding to global warming. They focused on assessing the capabilities and limitations of current monitoring systems and evaluating the evolving roles of numerical modelling and data-driven approaches. Importantly, attention was also paid to the implications for risk and how to find ways to enhance societal preparedness through improved understanding of dynamic processes, predictive capabilities, and communication strategies, in a rapidly warming climate.
A first key outcome of the Forum was the recognition that climate extremes must be understood as dynamic, multi-scale phenomena driven by the interplay of thermodynamic forcing, large-scale circulation, local processes, and human influences. Robust evidence exists for increasing heat extremes, heavy precipitation, and marine heatwaves, but changes in other type of weather extremes, such as wind extremes or hail, are more uncertain due to observational gaps and limitations in model representation of atmospheric dynamics. Addressing these challenges requires a stronger focus on process-based understanding through an improved representation of dynamics across scales and the use of multiple lines of evidence, rather than reliance on single datasets or methods.
A second major outcome was the identification of critical needs in monitoring and data integration. The discussions underscored that current observational systems remain spatially uneven, fragmented, and biased towards the Global North, with especially limited coverage for precipitation extremes, subsurface ocean conditions, and impact data. Even though extended Earth observation capabilities and emerging commercial satellite constellations offer unprecedented opportunities for near-real-time monitoring, their effective use depends on ensuring data continuity, homogeneity, and transparency. With respect to other types of datasets, the Forum highlighted the urgent need for global, standardised, and open impact datasets to enable impact-based attribution, risk assessment, and evaluation of adaptation strategies.
Finally, the Forum converged on the importance of moving beyond retrospective analysis towards anticipation, preparedness, and societal relevance. Participants emphasised that the most damaging outcomes often arise not from isolated hazards, but from compound, cascading, or unprecedented events that fall outside historical experience. In this context, worst-case thinking, storyline approaches and large-ensemble methods were identified as essential tools for exploring plausible high-impact futures.
The Forum concluded that advancing the science of climate extremes requires not only technical innovation, but also a closer integration across disciplines and stronger engagement with societal needs, that enable risk-informed planning and adaptation in a rapidly warming world.
Marta Marcos
The Forum brought together experts for an open, in-depth exchange aimed at producing a collaborative publication. Discussions focused on: (a) incorporating forests’ capacity to respond to change, grounded in their (phylo)genetic and functional diversity into predictions of future forest dynamics and Earth system impacts, and into understanding human influences and actions; and (b) advancing the role of Earth Observation (EO) in quantifying and monitoring change to inform models, management, and policy.
A central principle was to prioritise knowledge application. The Forum’s direction was guided by the needs of participants who use data products and algorithms to generate predictions, design interventions, and co-develop strategies, particularly linking data producers with applied scientists and decision-relevant contexts.
Fourteen participants contributed perspectives spanning genetic diversity and adaptive potential, biomass and water cycling, EO programmes, and the science–policy interface. Discussions identified critical gaps in understanding future forest states and their Earth system impacts, and explored how to better integrate data, models, and tools to address these gaps. Concrete examples of such integration were examined, and drafting of a joint manuscript began during the meeting.
Key insights were synthesised and shared publicly, and participants have continued collaborating since the Forum. By December 2025, core messages and illustrations were defined; integration case studies are being added in early 2026, with manuscript submission planned for mid-2026.
Michael Rast
Meeting: 5–7 February, 2025
Meeting: March 10-14, 2025
Meeting: April 7-11, 2025
Meeting: May 5–9, 2025
Meeting: May 26–27, 2025
Ghassem Asrar, University of Maryland, USA, working periods: 7.-24.4.2025 and 10.-22.6.2025
Stuart Bale, University of California Berkeley USA,working period: 23.6.-21.7.2025
Alina Bent, University of Warwick, UK, working period: 15.-19.9.2025
Sandra Chapman, University of Warwick, UK, working period: 15.-19.9.2025
Jianli Chen, University of Texas at Austin, USA, working period: 2.6.-31.7.2025
Angela Dapremont, Johns Hopkins University, USA, working period: 18.6.-9.7.2025
Jan Docekal, Silesian University Opava, Czechia, working period: 24-28. 2.2025
Duncan Galloway, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, working period: 7.-24.1.2025
Eric Gaidos, University of Hawaii, USA, working period: 13.-24.10.2025
Federico Gasperini, University of Colorado Boulder, USA, working period: 30.6-11.7.2025
Thomas Henning, Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Germany, working period: 1.-6.6.2025
Raluca Ilie, University of Illinois, USA, working periods: 7.-23.1.2025, 10.-26.2.2025 and 7.-25.4.2025
Jay Johnson, Andrews University, USA, working periods: 3.-14.6.2025 and 13.-17.10.2025
Connan Liptrott, University of Warwick, UK, working period: 15.-19.9.2025
Maria Madjarska, MPI for Solar System, Germany, working period: 16.-22.11.2025
Ben Poulter, Johannes Geiss Fellow, working periods: 22.2-7.3.2025, 14.7.-8.8.2025, 24.9-12.10.2025 and 2.-5.12.2025
Ivano Saccheo, University of Bristol, UK, working period: 10-21.3.2025
Jan Schee, Silesian University Opava, Czechia, working period: 24-28. 2.2025
Juri Skorov, Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Germany, working period: 24.7.-15.8.2025
Nicolas Watkins, University of Warwick, UK, working period: 15.-19.9.2025
Simon Wing, Johns Hopkins University, working periods: 3.-14.6.2025 and 13.-17.10.2025