For years, researchers have disagreed over whether the Moon possessed a strong global magnetic field 3.5–4 Billion years ago. Some Apollo samples appeared to record fields even stronger than Earth’s, while theoretical considerations suggested that the Moon’s small core should only have sustained a weak dynamo.
Claire and her colleagues demonstrate that both camps were, in fact, correct.
Their analysis of mare basalts reveals a striking link between titanium content and recorded magnetic field strength. Samples with high titanium concentrations consistently preserve evidence of very strong magnetic fields, whereas low-titanium samples record weak fields. The team proposes that melting of titanium-rich material at the Moon’s core-mantle boundary intermittently powered an intense but short-lived dynamo, lasting at most a few thousand years, and possibly only decades.
Crucially, because the Apollo missions preferentially sampled titanium-rich mare basalts from relatively flat landing sites, the returned collection is biased towards these rare high-field episodes. What appeared to represent hundreds of millions of years of strong magnetism may instead reflect brief and exceptional bursts in an otherwise weak-field lunar history.